Column 7B07 (5-27-84) by Richard Pavlicek

The optimistic bidding at one table is shown above. North was clearly the more guilty a simple preference to two hearts at his second turn would have been wiser; and his final jump to four hearts was a wild gamble.

4
by South
None Vul![]() | Q J 9 8 6 5 J 4 3 K 8 2 3 | |
10 4 3 A 5 2 A J 7 4 Q 8 2 | ![]() | A K 7 8 7 10 9 6 5 J 10 9 7 |
Lead: 2 | 2 K Q 10 9 6 Q 3 A K 6 5 4 |
| West Pass Pass Pass | North 1 ![]() 2 ![]() 4 ![]() | East Pass Pass All Pass | South 1 ![]() 2 ![]() 3 ![]() |
West made the excellent lead of a low heart in an effort to cut down the dummys ruffing power. After winning the heart nine, our South player embarked on an inferior line of play: club ace; club king; club ruff. Stranded in dummy, there was no way to reach the South hand to ruff another club so the contract had to fail.
A clever declarer could have made this hand with proper play, albeit due to a friendly lie of the cards. At trick two a spade should be led to dummys eight and Easts king. This leaves the defenders in a predicament. If trumps are cleared, declarer can win the third round in dummy and lead the spade queen for a ruffing finesse; then the diamond king provides an entry to the established spades. If trumps are not led, declarer can also succeed with careful play leading first to the diamond king; ruffing spade finesse; then crossruffing (or establishing the spades if West wins the diamond ace to lead trumps).
The story contains a moral. When your partners overbid (not yours, of course) puts you in a treacherous contract, look for a lie of the enemy cards that will allow you to succeed. Then play on that assumption.

Copyright © 1984 Richard Pavlicek. All rights reserved.