Article Collection 7A41 by Richard Pavlicek

Notrump Play


The 10 articles in this collection were written by Richard Pavlicek and appeared in various publications (mostly in South Florida) from 1991 to 1999. Each of the articles pertains to notrump play by declarer, so here’s an opportunity to improve your technique. Try to decide how you would play each contract before reading the explanation of the play.

Copyright © 2002 Richard Pavlicek.

Article 7A08

Counting To Avoid a Guess

Today’s deal from a local club game provides a good lesson in declarer-play technique. The bidding shown was common at many tables: After West’s preemptive opening, North made a takeout double (a little light perhaps, but it’s difficult to pass) and South could not resist jumping to Blackwood and bidding six notrump.

The final contract is sound, and in fact superior to a slam in clubs. Why? Because in notrump declarer can postpone his guess for the queen of clubs, whereas in clubs declarer must make this decision immediately for fear of a ruff.

6 NT by South

None Vul
S K Q 10
H 8 2
D A 9 7
C A 10 9 6 5
S 7 2
H K Q J 10 7 5 4
D 6 3
C Q 2
[W - E]S 9 6 5 4 3
H 6
D 10 8 5 4 2
C 4 3
Lead: H KS A J 8
H A 9 3
D K Q J
C K J 8 7

West
3 H
Pass
All Pass
North
Dbl
5 H
East
Pass
Pass
South
4 NT
6 NT

Let’s consider the play as it might have occurred at three different tables.

“Average Joe” was declarer at table one. After winning the second heart lead, he considered the play of the club suit. He had a combined holding of nine cards and, because of the bridge maxim, “eight ever; nine never,” he knew never to finesse for the queen. Therefore, Joe cashed the top clubs and made his contract. Well done.

“Thoughtful Tom” was at the wheel at table two. He also won the second heart lead and considered the play of the club suit. He knew the normal percentage play holding nine cards, but this was not a normal situation. With hearts breaking seven-one, the odds greatly favored East to hold longer clubs. Therefore, Tom led a club to dummy’s ace and finessed the jack on the way back. Oops! Down six.

“Expert Ernie” held the South cards at table three. He too won the second heart lead; but he was in no hurry to tackle the club suit. To find out more about the enemy distribution, he cashed all his winners in the other suits. Ernie learned that West began with exactly two spades and two diamonds. Combining this with the known seven-card heart suit, left West with two clubs — no more, and no less. Consequently, cashing the clubs from the top was a 100-percent guarantee.

It should be apparent that Joe’s success was lucky. Tom, of course, was unlucky. And Ernie? He didn’t need any luck.

Counting the Easy Way!

Many players are afraid to get into counting a bridge hand because they think it is difficult and only for the experts. It certainly would be if you tried to count every card as it is played. Forget it! Doing it that way might also drive you out of your mind. Fortunately, there is a better way. Good players think of each suit layout as a pattern. There are 39 possible patterns, of which only about half are reasonably common. If you memorize the common ones, you will have a mental template for association. The 20 most common patterns are:

 1. 4-4-3-2
 2. 5-3-3-2
 3. 5-4-3-1
 4. 5-4-2-2
 5. 4-3-3-3
 6. 6-3-2-2
 7. 6-4-2-1
 8. 6-3-3-1
 9. 5-5-2-1
10. 4-4-4-1
11. 7-3-2-1
12. 6-4-3-0
13. 5-4-4-0
14. 5-5-3-0
15. 6-5-1-1
16. 6-5-2-0
17. 7-2-2-2
18. 7-4-1-1
19. 7-4-2-0
20. 7-3-3-0

For example, say you are declarer and this is your holding in the trump suit:

4 3 2
[W - E]
A K Q 6 5

Do not count the missing trumps! Assume you cash the ace and both follow, then when you cash the king an opponent shows out. Instantly you should recognize the common 5-4-3-1 pattern as the original layout of the suit. Hence you will always have one more card than your opponent unless you or he ruffs.

Article 7H57

Combine Your Chances

You don’t have to be a mathematician to be an excellent bridge player. In fact, it has been evidenced over the years that mathematical theorists seldom reach the top echelon in bridge. Why not? Because it is rarely necessary to know the exact odds or percentages to play a bridge hand correctly. As the story goes, a good mathematician can quote you his exact chances of success — probably to at least two decimal places — after he has gone down in his contract.

The key to successful play is to have a logical and practical mind. Try to find two or more chances, then look for a line of play that will take advantage of as many of the chances as possible. Witness this deal from a recent Swiss team event:

3 NT by South

S K 9 4 2
H A 2
D A Q 8 6 4
C A 4
S A 7
H K 10 7 6 5
D 10 7
C 8 6 5 2
[W - E]S Q J 10 8
H J 9 8 4
D K J 9
C 9 7
Lead: H 6S 6 5 3
H Q 3
D 5 3 2
C K Q J 10 3

West

Pass
All Pass
North
1 D
2 NT
East
Pass
Pass
South
1 NT
3 NT

You breathe a sigh of relief when you win the H Q at trick one. There are eight top tricks: two hearts, one diamond and five clubs. Pretend you can’t see the E-W hands and ask yourself how you would play. Would you (1) run the clubs, (2) lead a diamond to the queen, or (3) lead a spade to the king?

First, you cannot gain a trick in clubs; you already have five. So options 2 and 3 are the only chances to make your contract. It is very important which chance you try first.

If you take the diamond finesse and it loses, a heart back will knock out your last stopper. Now you are history! The opponents can set you regardless of what you do next.

The right play is to lead a spade to the king. This wins as the cards lie. But note that if East were able to capture the S K, you would still be alive to try the diamond finesse (except in the extreme unlikelihood that East has S A-Q-J-10-x). Leading the spade first gives you two chances instead of just one.

Article 7H65

Man’s Best Friend

“How can you open that dog!” South ranted after going down in 3 NT. “It’s not an opening bid in anyone’s book.”

“It is in my book,” North retaliated. “I have 13 points, 12 in high cards and one for distribution.”

“But you don’t have two defensive tricks! And your spot cards are all deuces — kind of like your brain. What’s your book called? Dogmeat On Bidding?

“No, but I know what to name your book!”

3 NT by South

S Q J 4 3 2
H A J 2
D K J 2
C 4 3
S A 6 5
H 10 9 8 6
D 9 5
C A J 9 6
[W - E]S 9 8 7
H K 5 3
D 10 8 7 6
C Q 8 7
Lead: H 10S K 10
H Q 7 4
D A Q 4 3
C K 10 5 2

West

Pass
North
1 S
3 NT
East
Pass
All Pass
South
2 NT

When the heart finesse lost to East’s king, he wisely shifted to the C 7; 10, jack; then a low club went to the queen and king. There was no hope without the spade suit, but West grabbed the first spade and took the setting tricks in clubs. Too bad.

South’s new book will be called Dogmeat On Play. The heart finesse was foolish because a club shift is obvious in view of dummy. By winning the H A and starting spades, declarer has the timing on his side and the contract is unbeatable. When West takes the S A he can put his partner in with a heart, but South simply covers any club lead to lose at most four tricks.

The underlying principle (or should I say dogma) is to consider the full layout, not just a single suit, when deciding your line of play. The heart finesse might be obvious looking at six cards, but declarer was dealt a lot more than that.

Article 7K01

The Metz Grand

This month’s deal was played by Ed Metz about 10 years ago. Metz, though not an expert, was an experienced player and usually a winner, especially when it came to making bold slam bids. As South he reached a mere 7 NT on the auction shown.

7 NT by South

S 4 3
H K Q J 10 9 7
D Q J 10
C A 2
S J 7 5
H 8 6 5
D K 5 4 3
C Q 8 5
[W - E]S Q 9 8 6
H 4 3
D 9 7 6 2
C 10 9 3
Lead: D 3S A K 10 2
H A 2
D A 8
C K J 7 6 4

West

Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
North
1 H
2 H
4 H
5 D
6 D
East
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
South
2 C
2 S
4 NT
5 NT
7 NT

It is apparent that 7 H is a better contract because the club suit can be established with a ruff; but that would be too easy, and the Metz flair would be wasted. It is also apparent that 7 NT is impossible — declarer has 11 top tricks and both minor-suit finesses are destined to lose. Nonetheless, as baseball great Yogi Berra would say, “It ain’t over ‘til it’s over.”

West was a suspicious soul. He had seen Metz steal too many slams off the first two tricks, so he led a diamond. This converted 11 tricks into 12; and where there’s 12, Metz could usually eke out 13. He won the D Q and rapidly cashed the S A-K and both minor aces before running the hearts. On the last heart East let go a club to keep the S Q, South discarded his now useless S 10, and West had to discard a club to keep the D K. Finally, a club to the king brought down the queen — and almost the ceiling — as Metz romped home.

As he left the table, Metz could be heard explaining all the intricacies of the “double squeeze and Vienna coup” to his partner.

Article 7K03

Bold Bidding Wins

Ten years ago last month, Helen Shanbrom and my son Rich (with teammates Stanley Friedberg and Julius Freilich) pulled off an amazing upset in the Florida finals of the Grand National Teams. Helen has a great flair for the game, but also important is her easy-going, come-what-may attitude that brings out the best in her partners. Watch her in action as South.

3 NT by South

S A J 5 4
H A 10 8
D K 4 3
C 10 7 2
S 9 6 3
H Q J 6 4
D Q 9 7 6 5
C 9
[W - E]S K 8 2
H 9 3 2
D A J 10
C K J 6 5
Lead: H 4S Q 10 7
H K 7 5
D 8 2
C A Q 8 4 3

West

Pass
North
1 D
3 NT
East
Pass
All Pass
South
2 NT

After North’s skimpy opening, Shanbrom stretched to respond 2 NT. These two slight overbids resulted in a game with only 23 points. No problem! West led a heart; eight, nine, king; then the spade queen was led to the king. East returned a heart and declarer allowed West to hold the jack.

West now could beat the contract with a diamond shift; but this was not obvious, so West returned a heart to dummy’s ace. Shanbrom led the club 10, covered by East’s king, and South ducked to keep East on lead. East could do no better than return a spade, won by 10. The club ace was led to reveal the 4-1 break, dummy’s spades were run, then the club finesse gave Shanbrom the contract — and a 10-IMP gain when the opposing team routinely played in a partscore.

There was nothing truly spectacular here, just good solid technique, which is the hallmark of Shanbrom’s success. New players may also be encouraged to learn that Shanbrom uses almost no conventions. She keeps the bidding simple, and wins where it counts.

Article 7K31

Ten Tricks On Ice

On this deal from a knockout team event, the same contract was reached at both tables. On the auction shown, 4 NT was a quantitative slam invitation. The N-S hands, despite 32 HCP, had poor playing potential because of the flat, mirrored shapes. Both pairs judged well to stop at a safe level. Well, almost safe.

4 NT by South

S A K 3
H 7 6 3
D A Q 10 9
C 9 8 7
S 10 9 8 7 2
H K 9 5 2
D 3
C K 10 2
[W - E]S 5 4
H J 10 8
D 7 6 5 4
C J 6 5 3
Lead: S 10S Q J 6
H A Q 4
D K J 8 2
C A Q 4

West

Pass
All Pass
North
1 D
3 NT
East
Pass
Pass
South
2 NT
4 NT

At one table declarer won the spade lead and immediately ran four rounds of diamonds, as West threw two hearts and a club. Obviously, the contract now can be made by forcing out either of West’s kings without wasting a queen. But South was not playing with mirrors, and he opted to try both finesses — down one.

At the other table declarer looked a little deeper into the problem. After West discarded on the second round of diamonds, he found a surefire play to guarantee the contract. All the spades were cashed ending in dummy, then the C 9 was ducked to the 10 (if East played the C J, South would play the queen). West cashed his two long spades; North threw two hearts, and South a heart and a diamond. But now West was endplayed; either a club or a heart lead gives declarer his 10th trick.

Note the importance of cashing only two diamonds. If three rounds were cashed, declarer’s hand would be squeezed when West won his spades.

Article 7K38

Finesse Missed

This deal from an IMP team match was bid to 6 H at one table, easily making. At the second table the above auction occurred. The first five bids were natural, then 4 C and 4 H were ace-showing. South was concerned about the quality of his hearts, so he took a reasonable stab at 6 NT expecting the D 10 to be a useful card in establishing partner’s suit. Alas, it wasn’t.

6 NT by South

None Vul
S A K 4 2
H A 8
D A Q 7 4 3 2
C 2
S 9 6 5
H Q 7 4
D J 6
C Q J 10 8 4
[W - E]S 10 8 7 3
H J 10
D K 9 8
C 9 7 6 5
Lead: C QS Q J
H K 9 6 5 3 2
D 10 5
C A K 3

West

Pass
Pass
Pass
North
1 D
2 S
3 D
4 H
East
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
South
1 H
2 NT
4 C
6 NT

South won the club lead and had to decide which red suit to develop. Either suit required a 3-2 break, but diamonds also required a finesse; so declarer wisely chose the hearts. A heart to the ace, back to the king, then a third heart was conceded to West as North threw a diamond and East signaled with the D 9.

West shifted to the D 6 (clever not wasting his jack) and declarer was cooked. If he finessed he would be down immediately, so he hopped with the ace. Then he crossed to the S Q and won all the hearts and the C K. East simply kept the same last three cards as dummy, and with spades blocked declarer was down one.

It would not help to unblock spades early because that suit provides the only entry to South’s hearts. But there was a neat solution: On the first round of hearts declarer could finesse the eight — an avoidance play to prevent the killing diamond shift. Now the entries are available to cash all your tricks. Try it.

Article 7K39

Wrong Suit First

This deal occurred in an IMP team match, and the auction was the same at both tables. South’s 2 NT response without a spade stopper wouldn’t be seen in any textbook, but with 4-3-3-3 shape it’s the practical bid. It actually reaped a reward when West was dealt a normal club lead — a suit he would not have led if South bid clubs — giving declarer an eighth trick.

3 NT by South

N-S Vul
S J 9 7 4
H K J 10
D A Q 8 3
C Q 5
S A 10
H 9 6 3
D 9 7 2
C J 9 6 4 3
[W - E]S K Q 8 2
H 8 7 5 2
D K J 5
C 8 2
Lead: C 4S 6 5 3
H A Q 4
D 10 6 4
C A K 10 7

West

Pass
North
1 D
3 NT
East
Pass
All Pass
South
2 NT

After winning the C 10, declarer at one table led a diamond to North’s eight. This was the correct way to play diamonds, but it didn’t help. East won the D J and returned a club, won by the queen. Declarer crossed to the H Q and led a second diamond to the queen, king. East now reasoned that the only hope was to find West with the S A, so he led a low spade and the defense cashed out for down one. Unlucky. Or was it?

Not really. Declarer deserved his ill fate because he attacked the wrong suit. There was a legitimate chance to establish a spade trick, and with every other suit well protected he should try that first. The diamond finesse can wait. Leading a weak suit early also has the advantage of breaking up the enemy communication, which leads to more opportunities in the endgame.

Let’s do it right. At trick two lead a spade; 10, jack, queen; then East returns a club to the queen. Now lead a second spade, won by the ace. West does best to shift to a diamond, which you duck to the jack; then East exits safely with a heart.

The contract is now makable, though declarer must guess correctly to do so. I’ll let you work it out. It might help to lay out a deck of cards.

Article 7K42

Timing and Control

This deal from the July Nashville Regional seemed innocuous when it occurred, but a closer look brought out some remarkable aspects.

As West, I routinely overcalled 1 H then listened to my opponents breeze into game after North’s negative double. South’s 1 NT rebid was off shape, but I would surely do the same with that ugly diamond suit.

3 NT by South

E-W Vul
S K Q J 2
H 10 8 4 3
D A 2
C Q J 10
S 10
H Q J 9 7 6
D Q J 10
C A K 8 2
[W - E]S 9 7 6 5 4 3
H 2
D K 8
C 9 7 6 3
Lead: H QS A 8
H A K 5
D 9 7 6 5 4 3
C 5 4

West

1 H
Pass
North

Dbl
3 NT
East

Pass
All Pass
South
1 D
1 NT

My H Q lead went to the ace, and declarer played a diamond to the ace then a diamond to East’s king. On the club return I won the A-K and led a third club to remove North’s stopper. This gave declarer his eighth trick, but that’s all he could make. If he tried to set up his diamonds, I could take the setting trick in clubs.

Declarer got the timing right (it was correct to start diamonds) but he gave up his control too soon. Watch what happens if declarer ducks the first diamond. We must shift to clubs (else we won’t have a setting trick to take if declarer sets up diamonds) so assume I clear the suit as before. Declarer now runs the spades. I can part with two hearts easily, but what do I discard on the last spade? A heart or a diamond is immediately fatal, so I must throw my club. Now declarer wins the H K and leads a heart to set up the 10 as his ninth trick.

Careful study shows the diamond duck at Trick 2 is the only winning play. For instance, if declarer were to lead a club instead, West wins and leads a spade; far from obvious but it gently erodes declarer’s communication. A beautiful deal hidden in a plain wrapper.

Article 7A03

Bridge For All Ages

I arrived in Kansas City a day before the Vanderbilt in order to get in a few practice sessions with my partner Bill Root. Midway through the evening session of the Flight A Open Pairs we arrived at the table of Lynne Feldman and her 11-year-old son Jason, from Champaign, Illinois. An easy round perhaps? Hardly!

Jason seemed to have the maturity and poise of a person twice his age (or four times, six times…pick one) as he earned himself a cold top on the first board.

Board 25 4 C by East

E-W Vul
S 8 7 3
H A 6
D K 10 8 6 4
C K Q 8
S A K Q J
H Q J 8 7 2
D J 2
C 10 7
[W - E]S 9 6
H 10 5 4
D 9 7
C A J 9 6 4 3
Lead: D AS 10 5 4 2
H K 9 3
D A Q 5 3
C 5 2

LynneJason
West

Dbl
North
1 D
3 D
East
Pass
4 C
South
2 D
All Pass

Most players would respond 1 S with the South hand, but Jason didn’t like the quality of his spade suit. He opted to raise his mother’s diamond suit — rather keen judgment for an 11-year-old. (British author-expert Terence Reese would surely approve.)

What would you now do as West? Bill Root elected to double (as would almost any fine player). After all, who bids a minor suit over a takeout double when both majors are unbid? Gulp. North compounded the problem with a blocking bid of 3 D, and I guess I should have passed. But hope springs eternal, and I came to the rescue with that beautiful 4 C bid.

The defense was flawless. Jason led the ace and another diamond, then came two hearts and ruff. Down three, minus 300, and all the matchpoints to North-South.

On the next board it was Mom’s turn to shine.

Board 26 3 NT by North

Both Vul
S K 7
H A 10 4
D A Q 10 9 8 2
C 10 7
S 4 3
H K Q J 9 5 3
D 6 5
C K 3 2
[W - E]S Q J 5 2
H 8 7 2
D J 4
C 8 6 5 4
Lead: H 2S A 10 9 8 6
H 6
D K 7 3
C A Q J 9

LynneJason
West

3 H
North

3 NT
East
Pass
All Pass
South
1 S

West’s 3 H preempt made it difficult to reach the optimum contract of 6 D, and Lynne’s 3 NT bid would be the choice of most experts. This contract was destined for a mediocre score, but she made the most of it in the play.

I led the H 2 and the jack was captured with the ace. With 10 top tricks the problem was: Who has the C K? If East held it, she could win 12 easy tricks (probably 13 with a squeeze); if West held it, she does best to cash out or try for an endplay.

In expert fashion Lynne ran her diamonds then cashed both top spades ending in the North hand. West also had to guess what declarer was going to do. Was she going to cash out? Or try for an endplay? The former seemed more likely so West kept K-x in clubs. Sorry. Out came a heart and West had to surrender the last two club tricks to dummy. Winning 11 tricks salvaged a decent score.

Oh, well. Maybe we’ll run into some easier opponents in the Vanderbilt.

Copyright © 2002 Richard Pavlicek. All rights reserved.